Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Archaeological Interpretation
Topic Summary: Digital archaeology at Stonehenge
Created On: 09 April 2015 08:38 PM
Status: Read Only
Related E&T article: Stonehenge: digital mapping reveals the true picture
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 09 April 2015 08:38 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Posts: 1
Joined: 09 April 2015

The article states in the beginning, "The research has revealed that the area around Stonehenge was heavy with additional monuments, chapels and burial chambers...". If all that is being used is digital and remote sensing technology (i.e. motorised magnetometer systems, ground-penetrating radar arrays and electromagnetic induction sensors) to visualize what's under the surface at Stonehenge, then how do they know that these "additional monuments" are "chapels" and "burial chambers"?

Until they are actually excavated and studied (i.e. through your self-proclaimed "intrusive and time-consuming digging"), I think it would be academically prudent if we just refer to them as "structures" for the time being, and not speculate about their actual use or meaning. Until these artifacts have been properly studied everything is simply "speculation" or "educated guesses".

New here?

See Also:

FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2018 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.