"According to the plan outlined by Ms McCarthy, new gas-fired power plants would be limited to 1,000lb (450kg) of carbon dioxide emissions per megawatt hour. New coal-powered plans would be limited to 1,100lb.
Currently, the average coal plant emits about 1,800lb of carbon dioxide per hour."
Coal plants under Obama's plans have to reduce their carbon emissions to the atmosphere by roughly 36%.
Per megawatt day (acording to the above figures) coal stations produce roughly 20 tonnes of CO2, so according to Obama's plans they will now have to collect 7.8 tonnes of CO2 per MW day.
(5 * 7.8 is 39 tonnes for 5 MWe for a day.)
If you return to the previous post on the solvent energy regeneration costs
According to the SSE Ferrybridge CCPilot100+ figures collecting 39 tonnes of CO2 per day requires roughly 146 GJ of energy in terms of solvent regeneration alone.
The electrical energy generated during this period is 432 GJ (5MWe for 24 * 60 * 60 seconds)
Therefore the equivalent of 33 % of the electrical energy output of a coal plant will be required to capture 39% of the coal plant carbon emissions.
If another coal plant has to run to make up for this energy deficit the savings in CO2 will not as good as they first appear.
The storage part of CCS is obviously going to cost more energy, but that depends on how far the gas has to be pumped and the current pressure of the underground storage reservoir. Obviously as the reservoir fills up and pressurizes, the energy costs of storing it will gradually increase.
If people are going to push CCS they should state the capital and running costs at which they believe this can become a viable technology.
Given that CCS is a 40 year stop gap technology at best, it looks like a distinct loser at the moment, on the capital cost and energy running cost fronts.