IET
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Is a degree enough these days?
Topic Summary:
Created On: 05 January 2010 08:16 PM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
<< 1 2 Previous Last unread
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 16 July 2010 06:30 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



jencam

Posts: 475
Joined: 06 May 2007

Originally posted by: magarratt
Since 90's and the exponential growth in number of universities and degrees offered, once industry respected qualifications such as HNC/HND have become undervalued as today you can get a degree in anything from hairdressing to applied physics.


There is also the question whether the exponential rise in the number of graduates (mainly in 'easy' subjects or humanities) has devalued degrees in 'difficult' subjects such as physics or engineering. You hear that graduates are ten a penny nowadays compared with in the past but there were more graduates in certain degree subjects 10 or 20 years ago than this year.

A degree intended to be learning as opposed to taught experience should give students higher level theory, concepts, evaluation disciplines which they then go off and apply.


Are traditional degrees or training courses the better solution for creating engineers of the future? Don't forget that engineering is just as much a creative subject as it is an academic subject meaning that that ideas, innovation, and aesthetics are just as important components as the theory behind the functionality in any finished engineering product.

That said one can see from a technology perspective a micro electronics degree of the 1980's could as a standalone qualification will be outdated, likewise a aerodynamics degree of that time would not have covered current CFD norms.


Do qualifications resulting from once up to date but now outdated subject material have any value other than being a piece of paper?

To share 2010 view of F1 motorsport HR director, when asked what qualifications you look for in an engineer? Replied at pace we move someone who has just completed a motorsport degree is already outdated. We look for brightest engineers from leading universities, who have then gone into large corporations applied their skill in business, also learned relative project management, supplier management, quality and business principles.


Is this a very specific example of some 'high-calibre' engineering with few vacancies or is it representative of much of the engineering industry?
 17 July 2010 07:53 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



magarratt

Posts: 2
Joined: 29 March 2008

Dear Jencam

I can see your reasoning.

In a discussion string "comparing qualifications" which for consideration of all respected colleagues here, there are several debates ongoing in forums from Institute of Directors to technical sector groups also on linkedin. Thought of my post was to share information for perspective that once industry sought after qualifications such as HND's have become misrepresented. In balance at same time many technical degree's of today are not recognised or accredited by professional engineering institutions due at lack of rigor in certain areas. Comparison of qualifications is these days is more difficult:

UK market: Comparison of qualifications has been made more complex with introduction of different regional education frameworks for reference: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/...ntries_2008.PDF


International: Today we also operate in international markets, graduates and engineers competing with degrees from countries where study can be more technically demanding or not. A Engineering degree in Italy or Germany is typically 5 years study with no half way house. Likewise in US there are extremely technically demanding degrees, also ones of two years part time study.

Law: Factors such as introduction in UK of corporate manslaughter law has driven employers to manage risk by demonstrating for many jobs that employees are technically competent, which drives them to seek employees with higher foundation qualifications and mutual record of skills update for job in question.

Solution? If in answer to market conditions above professional institutions such as our own have positioning to look more on CPD in assessment of candidates for professional registration, encourage members to stay abreast of technologies and see IET as a professional network and career "home for life" perhaps we should not worry to much about debate of comparing qualifications.

Regards
Mark

Edited: 17 July 2010 at 08:01 AM by magarratt
 17 July 2010 10:26 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



westonpa

Posts: 1469
Joined: 10 October 2007

I think the value of a degree as with any training is for the individual person to decide, i.e., is it worth something to them. One person may get a lot from a top engineering degree whereas I know some people do not and yet others may get a lot from a media studies degree whereas others do not. The value of something is not just related to getting a good job....work and life balance is becoming more important.

That said of course some people invest their time and money and do not get their just rewards at the end of it and thus for them their degree may not seem to be of value. I think the real problem in all this is that training providers, career advisors and the last government mislead many young people and sold them a story about 'go get yourself and degree and you will do very well', i.e., like it was the be all and end all of everything. Qualifications are just that and in my opinion it was the advice coming from supposed reliable sources which was poor. If we tell young people realistically and honestly about their degree choices and where they may or may not lead then they can make their own decisions and have a better idea of how things may work out....we hope.

Regards.
 17 July 2010 09:18 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



jencam

Posts: 475
Joined: 06 May 2007

Originally posted by: westonpa
I think the value of a degree as with any training is for the individual person to decide, i.e., is it worth something to them. One person may get a lot from a top engineering degree whereas I know some people do not and yet others may get a lot from a media studies degree whereas others do not. The value of something is not just related to getting a good job....work and life balance is becoming more important.

That said of course some people invest their time and money and do not get their just rewards at the end of it and thus for them their degree may not seem to be of value. I think the real problem in all this is that training providers, career advisors and the last government mislead many young people and sold them a story about 'go get yourself and degree and you will do very well', i.e., like it was the be all and end all of everything. Qualifications are just that and in my opinion it was the advice coming from supposed reliable sources which was poor. If we tell young people realistically and honestly about their degree choices and where they may or may not lead then they can make their own decisions and have a better idea of how things may work out....we hope.

Regards.


Something that has to be taken into account (that doesn't seem to click with many people) is that education and qualifications are two completely different things in practice.

Holding qualifications does not necessarily mean one is educated because the course material leading to the qualifications could be out of date or poor quality, and to achieve high grades in exams or assignments means having to study the material regardless of what it is. Anything else is not a method to gain the qualification! My son holds an A grade computing A Level but was quite disappointed with the course material being dated, biased, and failing to cover many applications of computers. He was also disappointed to a lesser extent with the A Level maths course material.

On the other hand, it is perfectly possible for somebody to learn modern high quality information either outside of educational institutions or on taught or research courses that do not lead to well recognised / valued qualifications.
 20 July 2010 08:46 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



amillar

Posts: 1852
Joined: 28 May 2002

It is well worth reading job adverts. Those for the vast majority of engineer's jobs ask for a degree, very often "1st or 2.1". This may not be what the job needs, but the HR department are likely to reject any CVs that don't meet these requirements. Personally I certainly haven't noticed many that look for Master's.

It is not about the education required, it's about how to reduce 50-100 applications to a short list. On th other hand, advertising for a Master's may result in too few applicants.

It is possible to get an engineer's job without a degree, but unless you are very lucky you will need to both have a superb track record and be excellent at selling yourself. And even then you need to be aware that most employers will reject you out of hand.

-------------------------
Andy Millar CEng MIET MCMI

http://www.linkedin.com/in/millarandy
 17 August 2010 07:08 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



npdgroupindore

Posts: 1
Joined: 16 August 2010

I am very much agree with you that in present era it is very common and
we are still in requirement that we have to increase our level and
be very active to gain or earn more.

It is better if we gain knowledge of more and more products and items on
electronics.

Have a look to below for more details.

Thanks

pv-300pv-300
IET » Electronic engineering » Is a degree enough these days?

<< 1 2 Previous Last unread
Topic Tools Topic Tools
Statistics

See Also:



FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.