IET logo
 
IET
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: CoP 4th Edition : 'Duty Holder'
Topic Summary: Who is he/she?
Created On: 23 January 2013 11:39 AM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 23 January 2013 11:39 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



Patnik

Posts: 171
Joined: 25 June 2008

The new edition of the PAT Code of Practice puts responsibility for setting test intervals, record keeping etc on the 'duty holder'. Many work places already have named duty holders for EWR purposes. Is the PAT duty holder necessarily the same person? I'd assumed so but the more I look at the new CoP and the EWR the vaguer this term seems to be. The EWR seem to allocate duties to just about every employee.

It's obviously going to be important to know just who this person is - can any of you clever folk clarify?

Nik
 23 January 2013 06:45 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for kj scott.
kj scott

Posts: 2144
Joined: 02 April 2006

1.1.2 of the COP refers to Persons managing a maintenance scheme, and 1.1.4 then goes on to consider landlords, company directors, managers and building services managers.
The duty holder is the person who has the resources and ability to prevent danger within the undertaking, so this can be anyone; but ultimately the MD of a company would bear a portion of the responsibility.

-------------------------
http://www.niceic.biz
 24 January 2013 11:20 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



Patnik

Posts: 171
Joined: 25 June 2008

Thanks kj! The way it's put does seem to suggest that the person managing the maintenance scheme is the 'duty holder' referred to later in the CoP who is to set retest intervals etc. In our case he is not the existing building services duty holder who deals with fixed wiring issues. I can see no reason why the PAT 'duty holder' can't be a different person so long as we decide who he is and record it in writing (I doubt is going to want to be this duty holder after something goes wrong when everyone is looking for someone to blame if they've not already been identified).
Statistics

See Also:



FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2014 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.