![]() |
IET | ![]() |
|
search :
help :
home
|
||
|
Latest News:
|
|
|


|
Topic Title: Metal Work Topic Summary: Should it all be bonded Created On: 28 September 2012 08:07 PM Status: Post and Reply |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
|
Search Topic |
Topic Tools
|
|
|
|
|
evening ,
I have been testing in a food production area with machines etc..... My question is that some of themachines have either metal railings around them or metal steps that lead up to higher vantage point on the machine , now the machines are metal and earthed through either there 3 phase plug tops or are hard wired into the local fuse boxes . The steps and fences are free standing and are not bolted to the machines but you can be either standing on the steps or leaning on the fence and touch the machine , the fences and steps are just free floating on the tiled floor should these be bonded to the machines ???? cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If they don't actualy go into the floor I would say bonding not required.
Dave. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no they dont go into the ground ,
I just get a bit paranoid about worse case scenarios !!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I did once work in a basement full of CH pumps and Iron pipes with three boilers in in the room.
There was a metal screen free standing and fabricated from sheet metal. My initial thought was that BS 7671 does not require earthing or bonding as it is. However I did watch an employee using a portable drill initially drape the flex over this sheet metal then realising the implications that no matter how well rounded this sheet was the thiness meant the edge remained nearly sharp and subsequently moved the flex to the floor. Secondly, the proximity of the sheet metal to the pumps meant that it was conceivable that a person might lightly lodge themselves in the gap and therefore reminded me slightly of a restrictive conductive location. Therefore bonding to pipework might be more appropriate in this instance. ------------------------- Regards, Ebee (M I S P N) Knotted cables cause Lumpy Lektrik |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fences and steps are just free floating on the tiled floor ........... should these be bonded to the machines ???? Measure the ohmic value to a good earth, .......... Resistance = ?. If they can't introduce an earth potential, no bonding is required. Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flaming hell Ebee!
Do you realise how your post could be interpreted!!!!!!! Andy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flaming hell Ebee! Do you realise how your post could be interpreted!!!!!!! Andy That's nothing, I was working in close confines with some strippers the other day. ------------------------- S George http://www.state-it.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can someone please confirm the reding i require to confirm these dont need bonding ,
I think its 23k ohms to the MET of the building or is it to the local fuseboard ? Also what will my meter digits read on the lcd 23,000 ? cheers Ps if i have got the right figure ? I can not find this reading in the regs book , I remember reading a thread on forum about this ages ago and the figure sticks in my head , |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22K to the MET with everything else disconnected+1K human body
=10ma. 22K on IR setting of your tester. Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah i remember those days when consultants insisted everything within arms reach had an earth conductor going to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well not quite everything -
Handrails can be difficult - they have a nasty habit of exporting step and touch potentials way beyond where you'd expect them to be - similar to warehouse racking systems and mezzanine storage solutions. So bonding or otherwise needs a bit of thought - particularly if they are earthy anyway due to machine contact or containment fixings - and what the floor structure is. regards OMS ------------------------- Failure is always an option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah i didnt mean everything, i meant in arms reach of the electricalmequipment.
But those werethe days when suspended metal legs on floor would have a tenby clamp, and a ceiling grid would have a crimp and nut and bolt as well The good old days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I know - that's why I suggested handrails, crash barriers and racking present specific problems - it may be arms reach from a particular piece of kit but the other end of that metalwork could be a long way from the machine - but it will still rise to the machine potential under fault - you wouldn't want to be standing on a nice earthy floor touching the hand rail when a machine 25m away goes into a 5 second fault shutdown Regards OMS ------------------------- Failure is always an option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have had this dilemma before and discussed it with OMS and others on this forum.
For me I took it back to basic's.First of all,I dont want to introduce a potential danger or risk of electric shock . Second what does the regs say about earthing and bonding and when do we have to do it. Is the hand rail a exposed conductive part no, is the hand rail a extraneous conductive part. It might be,but its not introducing a potential that does not already exist, ie the floor. So by sticking a green and yellow on it you could be introducing a difference in potential between the hand rail and the floor as the MET is unlikely to be at the same potential as the floor,which is probably laying on the general mass of earth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was asked why we hadn't bonded the metal cable tray on an install.
I said show me in the regs where it states it needs to be bonded and asked how he thought bonding the tray and exporting touch voltages would make the installation safer. He walked away muttering something about the 15th. Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it earthed ? Regards OMS ------------------------- Failure is always an option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMS
The tray wasn't an exposed conductive part and it wasn't extraneous either. Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well I'm suprised at that - I'm assuming by your comment "not exposed conductive part" that you are making a claim of double insulation on the PVC oversheath of armoured cables and relying on the swa to act as the earthed metallic barrier between live parts and the tray then ?
Regards OMS ------------------------- Failure is always an option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't that what GN 8 says? (at least I think the old one did). If the cables themselves are safe to touch (either insulating sheath - deemed class 2 equivalent, or earthed metal sheath), then the tray should be just as safe without any additional precautions. Presumably no-one is putting unsheathed singles on steel tray? - Andy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well I'm suprised at that - I'm assuming by your comment "not exposed conductive part" that you are making a claim of double insulation on the PVC oversheath of armoured cables and relying on the swa to act as the earthed metallic barrier between live parts and the tray then ? Regards OMS 10.11 GN8 page 157. As always I would appreciate your thoughts. Regards Regards |
|
|
|
|
IET
» Wiring and the regulations
»
Metal Work
|
Topic Tools |
FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.





Search Topic


