![]() |
IET | ![]() |


|
Topic Title: Current carying capacity for a 1970's paper wrapped cable Topic Summary: Created On: 11 August 2012 05:00 PM Status: Post and Reply |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
Search Topic |
Topic Tools
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I'm trying to find out what the current carrying capacity would have been for a 0.25inch paper wrapped multi-core cable buried in a trench. I think the early editions of the 14th edition Wiring Regs would over this, does anyone know what the capacity was, or where to locate this information? Thanks Adrian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian
A 0.25 is the equivilent to a 150mm. It should do about 315A if buried. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adrian
PM me your email address and I will send you the tables from a past regs. book. ------------------------- John Peckham http://www.astutetechnicalservices.co.uk/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--i understand the 14th ed of the wiring regs quotes a rating of 375 amp
for 0.25 in defined conditions. however the electricity board use a rating of 410 amp for this size cable. Regards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's because you like to squeeze every last electron through it, 7671 tends to be a bit more conservative.
When you consider what you'll do with a bit of 95mm compared with what we can do with it our side of the meter, there's a little bit of a difference. Stu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generaly speaking DNO cables can be higher rated because the load is cyclic so the peak loads are only for a short time. Cables on the other side of the meter are rated for continuous use.
The DNO I worked for had primary transformers rated at 24MVA for domestic/commercial supplies but the same transformer would be rated 18MVA for supplying a continuous industrial load. |
|
|
|
|
FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.





Search Topic


