IET logo
 
IET
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Current carying capacity for a 1970's paper wrapped cable
Topic Summary:
Created On: 11 August 2012 05:00 PM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 11 August 2012 05:00 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



adrian ablitt

Posts: 2
Joined: 25 July 2008

Hello, I'm trying to find out what the current carrying capacity would have been for a 0.25inch paper wrapped multi-core cable buried in a trench. I think the early editions of the 14th edition Wiring Regs would over this, does anyone know what the capacity was, or where to locate this information? Thanks Adrian
 12 August 2012 08:26 AM
User is online View Users Profile Print this message



ArthurHall

Posts: 720
Joined: 25 July 2008

Adrian
A 0.25 is the equivilent to a 150mm. It should do about 315A if buried.
 12 August 2012 10:33 AM
User is online View Users Profile Print this message



John Peckham

Posts: 6880
Joined: 23 April 2005

Adrian

PM me your email address and I will send you the tables from a past regs. book.

-------------------------
John Peckham

http://www.astutetechnicalservices.co.uk/
 13 August 2012 09:42 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for UKPN.
UKPN

Posts: 338
Joined: 17 January 2012

--i understand the 14th ed of the wiring regs quotes a rating of 375 amp
for 0.25 in defined conditions.

however the electricity board use a rating of 410 amp for this size cable.

Regards.
 13 August 2012 10:03 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for slittle.
slittle

Posts: 3080
Joined: 22 November 2007

That's because you like to squeeze every last electron through it, 7671 tends to be a bit more conservative.

When you consider what you'll do with a bit of 95mm compared with what we can do with it our side of the meter, there's a little bit of a difference.


Stu
 14 August 2012 07:59 AM
User is online View Users Profile Print this message



ArthurHall

Posts: 720
Joined: 25 July 2008

Generaly speaking DNO cables can be higher rated because the load is cyclic so the peak loads are only for a short time. Cables on the other side of the meter are rated for continuous use.
The DNO I worked for had primary transformers rated at 24MVA for domestic/commercial supplies but the same transformer would be rated 18MVA for supplying a continuous industrial load.
Statistics

See Also:



FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.