IET logo
 
IET
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: SWA CCC values
Topic Summary:
Created On: 10 August 2012 03:55 PM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 10 August 2012 03:55 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for frspikeyhead.
frspikeyhead

Posts: 787
Joined: 27 December 2004

When your considering the current carrying capacities of SWA if you are using a 3 core as single phase and earth then I am pretty certain you use the values under the two core single phase table and not the lesser 3 core 3 phase values. Correct me if I am wrong.
 10 August 2012 04:19 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for OMS.
OMS

Posts: 17596
Joined: 23 March 2004

Correct - you only have two loaded cores not 3 so you can run more current through each core for the same temperature rise.

technically you could actually do something between the tabulated values for 2 core and 3-4 core as you have a slightly bigger surface area on the 3 core to lose heat - conservative to stick to the two core value though - and i know you like conservative design

regards

OMS

-------------------------
Failure is always an option
 11 August 2012 11:56 AM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for frspikeyhead.
frspikeyhead

Posts: 787
Joined: 27 December 2004

You know I like conservative design. Well I never. I've had all 4 grand children here wrecking the place and keeping me awake all night and yet that comment still brought a big smile to my face if not a chuckle. That obvious hey?
Statistics

See Also:



FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.