![]() |
IET | ![]() |
|
search :
help :
home
|
||
|
Latest News:
|
|
|


|
Topic Title: Path of earth loop impedance Topic Summary: Created On: 19 July 2012 07:56 AM Status: Post and Reply |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
Search Topic |
Topic Tools
|
|
|
|
|
Every diagram i have seen shows the fault on the live side of the load what would happen if the fault to earth occured on the neutral side of the load
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Every diagram i have seen shows the fault on the live side of the load what would happen if the fault to earth occured on the neutral side of the load"
Draw out a simple "loop" circuit using a load of say 1 kW and conductors of 0.1 Ohms and put your "fault" of 0.01 Ohms into the circuit as conventionally drawn and mark on the current in each conductor. Then redraw, but put the fault at your chosen position and re-mark the new currents and compare how much current now flows through the overcurrent protective device at the "start" of your circuit. Regards BOD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current would split two ways, depending on the resistances (impedances) of the neutral path and the earth path. The size of the fault current would be limited, because it has to flow through your load first.
Try to think of this in terms of water flow and pressure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In a Non RCD protected circuit you would probably never know because there is not much difference.
In a RCD protected circuit the RCD should trip and , if the RCD is double pole, it would disconnect the fault. ------------------------- Regards, Ebee (M I S P N) Knotted cables cause Lumpy Lektrik |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In every diagram I see the earth fault loop is always via the MET to the earth conductor, stake or PEN. None show the flow through alternative earth paths due to bonding, extraneous conductive parts etc. Nothing to do with the OP but just something which bugs me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These will be diagrams showing how to automatically disconnect a fault to mitigate the risk of electric shock. As neutral is normally fairly close to earth potential (and difference just due to voltage drop along N - perhaps a dozen volts at most), there's negligible risk of shock from a N to earth fault, so it's not a problem that needs addressing from a shock point of view. - Andy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Every diagram i have seen shows the fault on the live side of the load what would happen if the fault to earth occured on the neutral side of the load"
Thanks for the replies however i guess what I'm trying to say is because earth & neutral are almost the same potential would you be aware of a earth to neutral fault or simply, a live to earth fault will trip the MCB as will a live to neutral fault, what happens if the neutral is in contact with earth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I said earlier
"In a Non RCD protected circuit you would probably never know because there is not much difference. " ------------------------- Regards, Ebee (M I S P N) Knotted cables cause Lumpy Lektrik |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The N current will split between the N and PE conductors. Overcurrent devices (fuses, MCBs) won't notice that. RCDs usually would and trip. There is a danger with a undetected/uncorrected N-PE fault - if the N then goes open circuit all the N current is then carried by the PE conductor. If PE is smaller than the live conductors then (e.g. as with most T&E cables) there's a risk of it overheating and a possible fire hazard. If the PE-N short is on a small circuit (say lighting), but the N break is significantly further upstream (e.g. a faulty main switch) then a very large N current (e.g. that for the entire installation) could be trying to find its way back via the c.p.c. of the circuit with the N-PE fault - e.g. a 1mm2 c.p.c. - giving a significant fire risk. - Andy. |
|
|
|
|
|
IET
» Wiring and the regulations
»
Path of earth loop impedance
|
Topic Tools |
FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.





Search Topic


