IET logo
 
IET
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Clarification on need for new 17th CU
Topic Summary: Clarification on need for new 17th CU
Created On: 02 July 2012 06:27 PM
Status: Post and Reply
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
1 2 3 Next Last unread
Search Topic Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 02 July 2012 06:27 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



benspark

Posts: 21
Joined: 20 July 2007

To all the Part P and electrical experts in this group, can someone kindly clarify where in 17th edition it states that a RCD board is required for kitchen circuit (I am aware that this is a special location) to upgrade a perfectly working 16th edition board (no RCD but individual MCB).

I just need clarification that this is deemed necesarry and the cost of an extra £375 is required. The current earth bonding on this TNS supply is sufficient and the earth loop readings are within requirements.

Sorry to ask a basic question to you experts!

Ben
 02 July 2012 06:45 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



deapea

Posts: 365
Joined: 13 May 2007

Are you the customer who has been presented with the quote or the elctrician carying out the install?
 02 July 2012 06:46 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for kj scott.
kj scott

Posts: 2084
Joined: 02 April 2006

There is no requirement to change the distribution board if you are installing a new domestic final circuit, there are however various requirements to provide mechanical protection, or rcd protection to the installed wiring and also socket outlets. (411.3.3)(522.6.101)(522.6.102)
Edit,
BS 7671, does not define a kitchen as a special location.

-------------------------
http://www.niceic.biz
 02 July 2012 07:03 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



benspark

Posts: 21
Joined: 20 July 2007

A close relative is the customer (pensioners) and the electrican has quoted to remove the existing ring main (which is fine!) and install new 'stating that RCD is required for both lighting and power new circuits - hence new 17th edition board!'

They also stated that the main earth bond (current 10mm) on TNS needed replacing to 16mm at over £150!

I may not be a electrician but I could scream at times!
 02 July 2012 07:14 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for OMS.
OMS

Posts: 17743
Joined: 23 March 2004

They will need to provide RCD protection to the new "ring" a nd possibly to the lighting (dsepending onthe cable type/install.

The bonding is fine at 10mm2


If the current DB is pretty new, I'll bet you can get an RCBO to replace the MCB that feeds the old ring

Someones having a Giraffe

Regards

OMS

-------------------------
Failure is always an option
 02 July 2012 07:31 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for kj scott.
kj scott

Posts: 2084
Joined: 02 April 2006

Originally posted by: benspark

A close relative is the customer (pensioners) and the electrican has quoted to remove the existing ring main (which is fine!) and install new 'stating that RCD is required for both lighting and power new circuits - hence new 17th edition board!'

Why is the rewiring of the circuit being suggested?

They also stated that the main earth bond (current 10mm) on TNS needed replacing to 16mm at over £150!

As OMS says nothing wrong with 10mm.

I may not be a electrician but I could scream at times!


RCD's would not required to an existing circuit unless it is altered or replaced; but would be an expected recommendation item for an electrical installation condition report

-------------------------
http://www.niceic.biz
 02 July 2012 07:37 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



benspark

Posts: 21
Joined: 20 July 2007

Thank you for the expert advice....you know deep down it is not right but at times support is required.

I started to question the quote when they proposed to hid all the white good isolators in cupboards, which I questioned how a pensioners would (a) be able to isolate and (b) know where the switches are and what they do!
 02 July 2012 07:41 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for kj scott.
kj scott

Posts: 2084
Joined: 02 April 2006

Is this a kitchen refit?

-------------------------
http://www.niceic.biz
 02 July 2012 07:46 PM
User is online View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for rocknroll.
rocknroll

Posts: 8539
Joined: 03 October 2005

It should not to be construed as implying that existing installations shall be retrospectively made to comply with the latest regulations. As long as existing installations continue to give satisfactory service they do not need to be brought up to current standards until major repairs/refurbishment is planned, and for most people today when it is prudent to do so.

regards

-------------------------
"Take nothing but a picture,
leave nothing but footprints!"
-------------------------
"Oh! The drama of it all."
-------------------------
"You can throw all the philosophy you like at the problem, but at the end of the day it's just basic electrical theory!"
-------------------------
 02 July 2012 07:49 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for kj scott.
kj scott

Posts: 2084
Joined: 02 April 2006

Nice one RnR, a perfect Sir Humphrey.

-------------------------
http://www.niceic.biz
 02 July 2012 07:51 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for Paradigm.
Paradigm

Posts: 653
Joined: 10 September 2010

Originally posted by: rocknroll

It should not to be construed as implying that existing installations shall be retrospectively made to comply with the latest regulations.

regards



I know I am a bit thick but what does that actually mean?

Nick

-------------------------
"be careful of what you write"
 02 July 2012 07:54 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



benspark

Posts: 21
Joined: 20 July 2007

yes - unfortunately, but they are Part P and NICEIC etc or so called experts!
 02 July 2012 08:03 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



alanblaby

Posts: 170
Joined: 09 March 2012

As for the 'main earth bond' there could be some misunderstanding of correct terminology here, could this be the Earthing Conductor that needs upgrading to 16mm, rather than the Main Protective Bonding Conductors?
Though £150 does seem rather excessive, what is that, a days work to fit 20 m of single core?
I'd like to earn that, but, without knowing what is actually being quoted for, we cannot really give a definitive view - upgrade of a tortuous run to gas, and another tortuous route to the water, then I could see £150.
Kitchen - appliances all moved, so need new FCU, then using an old MK board which is difficult to get breakers for, then a new CU may be the best option.
However, if a recent board, with a readily available RCBO, then it could be an easy job.
Who knows without more, accurate , details.
Alan.
 02 July 2012 08:21 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for OMS.
OMS

Posts: 17743
Joined: 23 March 2004

Originally posted by: Paradigm

Originally posted by: rocknroll

It should not to be construed as implying that existing installations shall be retrospectively made to comply with the latest regulations.

regards


I know I am a bit thick but what does that actually mean?

Nick


If you don't f**k about with it, it'll be fine and all this 17th edition RCD malarkey isn't required - in a nutshell.

I couldn't possibly say that though -

Regards

OMS

-------------------------
Failure is always an option
 02 July 2012 08:25 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for spinlondon.
spinlondon

Posts: 4375
Joined: 10 December 2004

Doesn't matter if it is the earthing conductor, 10mm² is all that is required, unless the live conductors are 35mm² or greater.
 02 July 2012 08:46 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for kj scott.
kj scott

Posts: 2084
Joined: 02 April 2006

Originally posted by: benspark

yes - unfortunately, but they are Part P and NICEIC etc or so called experts!


Being part P registered does not make them experts, only approved to self certify their own work.
Does the furniture refit require relocaton of, or additional outlets; perhaps some level of specification is needed, rather than a free for all for the installer.

-------------------------
http://www.niceic.biz
 02 July 2012 08:51 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for kj scott.
kj scott

Posts: 2084
Joined: 02 April 2006

Originally posted by: Paradigm

Originally posted by: rocknroll



It should not to be construed as implying that existing installations shall be retrospectively made to comply with the latest regulations.



regards






I know I am a bit thick but what does that actually mean?



Nick


As I said, perfect Sir Humphrey. He has said a lot, but it means nothing more than was previously stated. A recommendation is just that, you don't have to take action, just consider the facts.

-------------------------
http://www.niceic.biz
 02 July 2012 10:47 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for UKPN.
UKPN

Posts: 340
Joined: 17 January 2012

--"does not matter if it is an earth lead, 10mm is ok"
incorrect, min size earth lead for PME is 16mm

Regards.
 02 July 2012 10:54 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message



impvan

Posts: 642
Joined: 07 September 2005

UKPN: in the OP's second post he states it's TN-S....
 02 July 2012 11:02 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message


Avatar for Rulland.
Rulland

Posts: 348
Joined: 11 April 2008

UKPN=Dave Cockburn
Regards.

-------------------------
Those who make no mistakes do very little work!!......
IET » Wiring and the regulations » Clarification on need for new 17th CU

1 2 3 Next Last unread
Topic Tools Topic Tools
Statistics

See Also:



FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.