![]() |
IET | ![]() |
|
search :
help :
home
|
||
|
Latest News:
|
|
|


|
Topic Title: Zs too high Topic Summary: RCBO Created On: 12 May 2011 09:35 AM Status: Post and Reply |
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch |
Search Topic |
Topic Tools
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
If the Zs in a circuit exceeds the max in the regs is it acceptable to use an RCD or RCBO? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In short yes,but in my opinion new circuits shouldnt be designed with this in mind.
------------------------- Regards Dave(not Cockburn) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a school of thought that suggests if you are using an RCBO you should still design for a limiting Zs for the overcurrent part of the breaker as the RCD is generally only providing "additional protection"
If Zs is that high, you might also want to check the predicted L-N loop to determine protection from short circuits As DG66 points out - I certainly wouldn't be designing for this condition on new works Regards OMS ------------------------- Failure is always an option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
If the Zs is noted as high in a PIR even though the circuit is protected by an RCD or RCBO would there be a code 2 for requires attention? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a PIR my personal view is if the max Zs is only just above the max tabulated value and an RCD is fitted then i wouldnt worry too much and make a note on the report,obviously if the measured value is way above the max tabulated value then i would code 3 requires further investigation as to why the readings are so way out,you've seen the situation its your call.
------------------------- Regards Dave(not Cockburn) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------no problems there, PSCC will be ok, RCCD will trip
unless the loop is horrendous and overload well covered if trip sized correctly------------- ---------------------------------------------------- pmesystemdesign@btinternet.com ---------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the responses. There have been alterations to an existing circuit and the MCB has been changed to an RCBO which I expect is due to the high Zs. The latest PIR shows a code 2 for the high Zs.
regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cant see a code 2 myself,no code 4 either as it seems compliant,hence possibly a code 3 dependant on the situation.
------------------------- Regards Dave(not Cockburn) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------no problems there, PSCC will be ok, RCCD will trip unless the loop is horrendous and overload well covered if trip sized correctly------------- ---------------------------------------------------- pmesystemdesign@btinternet.com ---------------------------------------------------- I'd forgotten you DNO boys could predict L-N loops without even visiting site How can you possibly know that PSCC will be high enough to trip the MCB part of the RCBO. Zs tells you that the L-E loop is high in this case - it doesn't tell you if it's high on E or on L. If it's the latter it's quite possible that N will be high as well You surely can't be contesting the suggestion that a check on the L-N loop is worthwhile Before you reply, perhaps best to make sure you aren't arguing with a fool though - you wouldn't want to look foolish would you regards OMS ------------------------- Failure is always an option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------the difference, is the experience I have gained over many
years, You can tell from reading this situation from this poster that this query is no big deal. as you say, the poster didnt tell us the figures, if they were that bad the installation would have many issues. and another thing- I have seen the apalling abuse that DC is getting, its a disgrace, this is the IET I am surprised people havnt been reprimanded. I saw the word "stupid" used for people who believe a particular site is being used misleadingly. who is the real stupid one? the "Zs too high" poster is satisfied, by the way by our answers, and has thanked us. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------------the difference, is the experience I have gained over many years, You can tell from reading this situation from this poster that this query is no big deal. Ahhh - I forgot you guys can tell me ze depending on what part of town we're in. As for being no big deal, the circuit has been altered you don't know if that lateration has added significant cable lengths that are presenting as high zs but could be masking low PSCC and appalling volt drop issues. as you say, the poster didnt tell us the figures, if they were that bad the installation would have many issues. It would, but it's generally a case that at this stage no one knows and another thing- I have seen the apalling abuse that DC is getting, its a disgrace, this is the IET I am surprised people havnt been reprimanded. There's a moderator button bottom left of each post - fill your boots I saw the word "stupid" used for people who believe a particular site is being used misleadingly. who is the real stupid one? As I said, there's a moderator button - it won't be the first time a few of us have had our collars felt by the mods - i guess you haven't had that pleasure yet the "Zs too high" poster is satisfied, by the way by our answers, and has thanked us. Indeed - but I guess you've heard the phrase "Ignorance is bliss" - it may well be that this is an unknown unknown scenario May I conlude by your response that you aren't feeling foolish at the moment OMS ------------------------- Failure is always an option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the responses. There have been alterations to an existing circuit and the MCB has been changed to an RCBO which I expect is due to the high Zs. The latest PIR shows a code 2 for the high Zs. regards If a Zs value is high, then you need to establish whether it is due to circuit conditions, supply conditions, or a fault. You can then descide the appropriate course of action. Just installing an RCD or RCBO may not be the solution in a deteriorating installation. It would appear that PME is psychic. Relying on experience is fine where the experience is valid and gained from a correct source. However we are seeing the result of inadequate/incorrect knowledge gained from 'past experience', in another long running thread. Spending a long time doing something the wrong way does not make you competent. ------------------------- http://www.niceic.biz |
|
|
|
|
|
IET
» Wiring and the regulations
»
Zs too high
|
Topic Tools |
FuseTalk Standard Edition v3.2 - © 1999-2013 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.





Search Topic


