<?xml version="1.0" ?> 
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
  <title>IET - Communications engineering</title> 
  <description></description> 
  <link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/index.cfm?forumid=1</link> 
  <generator>FuseTalk Standard Edition</generator> 

	<item>
		<title>Frequency Modulated Singing on BBC Radio 4</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=52585</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-05-21T20:27:09 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>jarathoon</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ "BBC Radio 4 interrupted by yodelling"<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10052049/BBC-Radio-4-interrupted-by-yodelling.html">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/cul...ted-by-yodelling.html</a><br /><br />"In search of a mystery yodeller"<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22596063">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22596063</a><br /><br />"BBC Radio 4 is alive to the sound of yodelling"<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/mediamonkeyblog/2013/may/13/bbc-radio-4-yodelling">http://www.guardian.co.uk/medi...bbc-radio-4-yodelling</a><br /><br />"The Independent reports that music kicked in after the engine of the car Jones was being interviewed in had to be restarted after the battery went dead."<br /><br />]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Can you build a new business out of an old technology?</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=52545</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-05-20T13:44:34 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>jarathoon</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ This post is inspired by a BBC web page entitled<br /><br />"Press rewind: The cassette tape returns" By Kate Dailey (BBC, Montreal)<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22533522">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22533522</a><br /><br />"Join the discussion<br />Can you build a new business out of an old technology?<br /><br />Join @BBCBusiness in a live Twitter Q&A on Monday 20 May at 1600 BST (1100 EST) to discuss how one company, successfully selling cassette tapes, has done just that.<br /><br />You can send us your questions using the form at the bottom of this page or via Twitter using the hashtag #BBCrunningabusiness"<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Something I have also now read the 'Digital Economy Act 2010" in regards to the National Analogue Radio Switch Off.<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/24/section/30">http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/24/section/30</a><br /><br />According to the law as now enacted the only organisations that can now have any influence over the government are Ofcom and the BBC. Ofcom it appears want to stay out of the fight, so that just leaves the BBC.<br /><br />The analogue switch off is accomplished by Ofcom withdrawing National Broadcast licences in the AM and FM band. But FM can't be broadcast as a national signal it has always been a mosaic of local transmissions.<br /><br />So the law as currently written can legally be circumvented by applying for a full deck of local fm broadcast licences and using clever audio automation tricks to make all these 'local broadcasts for local people' different enough to obey the Ofcom content censorship rules. (Sorry I used to live near Hadfield)<br /><br />So with the right technology the "FM Band Heritage Radio UK" consortium can buy the complete FM national transmitter network from the BBC and continue to broadcast nationally by using a mosaic of multi-symbiotic virtual broadcast stations.<br /><br />James Arathoon<br />]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Radio Communications in the event of a national or regional civil emergency</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=52503</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-05-15T23:04:01 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>jarathoon</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ "Government emergency communications policy: Digital radio action plan report"<br /><br />https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-emergency<br />-communications-policy-digital-radio-action-plan-report<br /><br />This should answer the question of what we do if large numbers of home lose their mains grid power or if satellite communications fail due to a solar storm etc.<br /><br />If we switch off national AM and FM analogue transmitters we will have to rely on digital radio for civil emergency communications. The energy efficiency of digital radios will become an enormously important performance feature that could mean the difference between life and death in the midst of an emergency<br /><br />(Questions for GCSE Science Students<br /><br />- How long will a the average DAB receiver last on batteries in the midst of a regional or national emergency where mains grid power to the home is lost? [Spreadsheets with the power consumption of DAB radio receivers is available on the www.gov.uk website]<br /><br />- Estimate how many radios can be powered from the stocks of batteries kept by a supermarket near you?<br /><br />-Therefore how many people can listen to DAB emergency radio communications and for how long, using the stock of batteries in your local supermarket, in the event of a national or regional loss of the power grid?)<br /><br />The digital radio switchover critera given in this document really are very different to those given in other documents.<br /><br /><i>"it will be necessary for coverage of both local and national to match current FM levels and near universal conversion of households (who consume radio) before any switchover takes place"</i><br /><br />This would be an extremely expensive policy for the public to fund!<br /><br />Full quotes from the document given below:<br /><br />"3.4.3 The criteria which Government has stated would need to be satisfied before any Radio Switchover is that:<br />. 50% of listening is to digital platforms; and<br />. national coverage is comparable to FM and local coverage reaches 90% of the population and all major roads.<br /><br />This is just the threshold for setting a date for switchover and it will be necessary for coverage of both local and national to match current FM levels and near universal conversion of households (who consume radio) before any switchover takes place. Therefore, the implementation of a switchover policy would not, either during its implementation or after completion, affect radio's role in any emergency communications."<br /><br />"3.5 Conclusion<br /><br />3.5.1. It is clear that radio, both as in analogue and digital form, continues to have an on-going role in emergency planning protocols, although it is now part of a wider range of communication methods.<br /><br />3.5.2. While a radio switchover will result in the closure of AM services, which had historically been important to the Government's protocols in this area, the diminishing value of this platform means it is increasingly less relevant as a universal communication platform. As a result in considering the impact of a possible switchover it is necessary to compare digital radio against FM not AM services. In this context the Radio Switchover proposals will replicate existing FM coverage and ensure a transition which protects consumers, therefore assuring an efficient transition and the widespread availability of radio services capable of having an active future role in communicating during local and national events."<br /><br />]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Analogue FM vs DAB vs DAB+ vs DRM+ vs Internet Radio</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=52493</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-05-15T14:53:17 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>jarathoon</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ The battle of the radio broadcast standards will definitely begin to play out in the next few years.<br /><br />DAB looks like a certain loser (if I were a bookie I wouldn't be taking bets on that), as Analogue FM, DAB+, DRM+ and Internet Radio can all better and more cheaply foster their own niches here in the UK. <br /><br />Unlike Betamax video players DAB receivers will still work on the Analogue FM band, so people will not have entirely wasted their money (altough their energy bills will be larger than they otherwise could be) as long as the cultural elite don't ram through their irrational programme to switch off all national Analogue FM broadcasts in 2015 or shortly afterwards.<br /><br />This EBU document (DIGITAL RADIO DISTRIBUTION IN EUROPE: Feb 2013)<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://tech.ebu.ch/docs/r/r138.pdf">http://tech.ebu.ch/docs/r/r138.pdf</a><br /><br />says<br /><br />"3. When DAB coverage is not possible, to use DRM as defined in ETSI ES 201 980 for digital radio broadcasting in the frequency bands currently used for analogue radio broadcasting;"<br /><br />Read "not possible" as economically uncompetitive. <br /><br />If this recommendation is agreed across Europe, it will effectively mean that all DAB broadcasts are likely to cease outside large conurbations as a combination of analogue FM and DRM+ (broadcast via the same transmitters) continues to reign supreme for in-vehicle listening.<br /><br />Remember all mobile phone radios are Analogue FM receivers because of the low power requirements. DAB would be hopeless in mobile phones, from an energy consumption point of view.<br /><br />The question is how will people will be able to receive DRM/DRM+ in the UK if the authorities don't allow these receiver capabilities to be added to the minimum vehicle and non-vehicle UK radio receiver specifications.<br /><br />I found reference to above EBU document on the "Q&A Digital or FM" page on the following website<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://digitalradioinsider.blogspot.co.uk/p/questions-and-answers-answers-to-23.html">http://digitalradioinsider.blo...rs-answers-to-23.html</a><br /><br />It also says that Norway is going to make a 3 or 4 digital channel DRM+ broadcast trial transmission in Trondheim on 94.0 MHz<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://digitalradioinsider.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/first-digital-broadcast-on-fm-in-norway.html">http://digitalradioinsider.blo...-on-fm-in-norway.html</a><br /><br />James Arathoon]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>FM Band Radio Broadcasts for Common People in the UK after 2015</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=52438</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-05-10T19:48:38 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>jarathoon</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Since my previous post in the "Energy" forum some amusing progress has been made. I even talked to someone who currently works for BBC Radio about my plans.<br /><br />see<br />"Energy consumption and reception of Digital Radio compared with Analogue FM"<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=226&threadid=52266&enterthread=y">http://www.theiet.org/forums/f...d=52266&enterthread=y</a><br /><br />In order to prevent the Analogue FM transmitters being switched off as planned by the cultural elite at the BBC, The Department of Culture Media and Sport, and Ofcom,  I am putting  together plans for a new consortium to take ownership of BBC's National Analogue FM Transmitter Network and broadcast licenses; that is once the BBC decide to sell them on. <br /><br />The consortium will be called  "FM Band Heritage Radio UK" <br /><br />As may of you know the existing plans involve the sudden execution of 30 million car and truck analogue radios on a single day when two completely irrelevant and nonsensical conditions are met. This will be done at huge collective cost to the common people of this country (over two years worth of aggregate licence fee payments will be needed to cover car and truck radio replacements alone).<br /><br />Lots of common touch content will be planned for "FM Band Heritage Radio UK" when the BBC Director General and the BBC Trust decide to walk away from analogue. <br /><br />There will be no "FM Band Heritage Radio UK" replacement for BBC Radio 3; it will be replaced by a national station that is dedicated Country and Western music instead (this is so I can read the letters of complaint accusing me of being a philistine).<br /><br />James Arathoon]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Sensing for Asset Protection using Integrated Electronic Networked Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=52375</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-05-07T14:31:49 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>drbrucmeister</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ News has reach me of a 100% funding call from a TSB  -  DSTL joint initiative.  This will be of direct interest to the practitioners and research groups looking at Asset Protection technologies especially in the field of sensing and sensor management technologies.<br /><br />More:  The Technology Strategy Board (TSB) and The Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) are to invest up to &#163;3m in the development of innovative sensing for asset protection.  This competition will be funded through the Small Business Research Initiative (SBRI).  Under SBRI, developments are 100% funded and focus on specific identified needs, increasing the chance of exploitation. Suppliers for each project will be selected by an open competition.  <br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://https://connect.innovateuk.org/web/11750784">More Information</a><br />A Competition Briefing will be held on the 14th of May 2013, Ambassadors Bloomsbury, 12 Upper Woburn Place, London, WC1H 0HX]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Has the EU banned analogue television broadcasting?</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=52365</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-05-06T14:07:35 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>jencam</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I have never managed to find out the true reason why analogue terrestrial television was switched off and replaced with Freeview but now I have encountered scraps of information that the EU was behind it. <br /><br />Digital terrestrial started life in the UK in 2008 as the ill-fated On Digital (later renamed ITV Digital) encrypted pay TV service by Carlton and Granada to circumvent the existing satellite and cable companies. Their intention was to complement analogue terrestrial broadcasts rather than replace them completely. After the collapse of ITV Digital in 2002, the BBC stuck their fingers in and reincarnated it as Freeview which is an unencrypted and free to view service, almost the exact opposite of On Digital.<br /><br />A few years later the government announces that analogue terrestrial broadcasts will be switched off. The official reasons include moving with technology, more TV channels, and to allow part of the radio spectrum to be sold to mobile phone companies. I recently noticed a discussion on the Democracy Forum that the EU was behind the analogue switch off as part of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive. Does anybody know more about this?<br /><br />Something I am aware of is that the pro-EU but Eurosceptic Green Party was opposed to the analogue switch off and wanted analogue terrestrial broadcasts to continue indefinitely so long as there was a consumer demand for them. They don't seem to have mentioned any EU legislation.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Digital TV</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=52361</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-05-06T06:56:33 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>g3xoi</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>9</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Can anyone tell me of some brands of television diplexers where each input it filtered - one a high pass and one a low pass.<br /><br />I want to pass Ch 48 and up on one and Ch 28 and down on the other.<br /><br />It is for indoor use, in an attic.  My problem is that the two transmitters are almost 180 degrees apart and even the best front-to-back ratio antennas will have a problem with that.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Communication systems in an office building</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=52301</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-04-30T12:40:21 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>adammid</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ 1) Would anyone be able to help me to determine what communication systems would need to be considered in a typical commercial office building?<br /> <br />2) and what would deter a designer from allowing all of these systems to share a single network?<br /> <br />May thanks]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Shoenberg and Rosing</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=51517</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-03-18T11:21:04 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>jobwilliams                                       </dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ The author repeats the often quoted statement that both Zworykin and Shoenberg were students of Rosing. Zworykin undoubtedly was, but was Shoenberg? According to the DNB, Shoenberg was born in 1880 in the Ukraine and studied at Kiev Polytechnic. In 1905 he moved to St Petersburg and worked setting up radio systems in Russia for a company which later became the Russian Marconi company. In 1914 he came to London. Boris Rosing was at the Technological Institute in St Petersburg from around the end of the 19th century to 1931 when he was exiled. Though the two men were in St Petersburg at the same time it would seem unlikely that Shoenberg was ever a student of Rosings. Has anyone further information that would resolve this?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>DSLAM Power Consumption</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=51378</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-03-12T11:07:39 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>iselinger</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I am having a 'discussion' with BT about installing FTC in my village.<br /><br />I need to find out roughly how much power a typical BT Openreach DSLAM cabinet consumes? <br /><br />Is it fixed or is there a base level and then the power consumption increases with the number of suscribers connected to the cabinet?<br /><br />Thanks in anticipation.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>RF test engineering hands on training course</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=51374</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-03-12T10:23:29 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>Nahid009</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br />I graduated with an MSC in communications engineering from the university of Birmingham with merit and I'm currently looking for jobs in the RF test engineering field.<br /><br />It's seems most positions put a lot of stress on the requirement for  hands on experience in various RF measurement equipments like oscilloscopes, signal generators, spectral analyzers etc. <br /><br />As such I'm looking for hands on training courses where I can gain hand on training on RF test and measurement equipments and test techniques. Would any one please be kind enough to advise me of any such training courses?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Fiber to Home Netowrk</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=51342</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-03-10T14:02:29 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>shehan</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Between GPON and GEPON technologies What factors, a 3G service provider should consider when going to deploy a FTTH network?<br /><br />Is there a possibility to give an input to OLT from BTS ?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>why dual antenna in EVDO rev A</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=51297</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-03-08T12:32:42 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>richardjohn</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ does anyone tell me why two receiver antenna in EVDO rev A and what its benefit?<br /><br />thanks for support in advance]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>LTE Blog for LTE student</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=51296</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-03-08T12:30:47 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>richardjohn</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ as i am getting from my friends who help me to complete my LTE receiver project and also good help from IET and he also suggest me some good site from which i like below he was good writer on LTE basi and LTE advance i like to share this site .<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.teletopix.org/">LTE Blog</a>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Sony Ericsson GT47</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=51257</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-03-08T12:27:56 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>oludareamos</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ i dont clear what exactly you want ?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>creating wireless sensor network in opnet14.5</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=51016</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-02-21T06:38:16 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>adilbashir09</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ hello everyone, i need to simulate a wireless sensor network for my research purpose but i am not too much aware of using OPNET, so can you please help me in creating a wireless network or WSN in opnet?<br /><br /><br />Thanks,]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Telphone Directories</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=50863</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-02-20T20:12:02 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>g3xoi</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ It's called privatisation.<br />I've even discovered that a separate company controls the numbering, so what chance is there of co-ordinating anything. Even the different bits of BT don't talk to each other, so you can forget a simple solution to a simple problem.<br /><br />Mind you, I think it all started when they stopped things called 'auxiliary' phone lines at a reduced rental and we had to pay full price for each line. I suppose we don't get the 'all lines to Reading are engaged, please try later' when you made a call just into the cheap rate any more.<br /><br />Ahh, those were the days...........]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Designing a mobile communication system</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=50919</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-02-17T22:31:34 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>devilmusic</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I have a project where I am asked to design a mobile communication system for an island that has no other mobile carrier. I have few questions that I would like some help on:<br /><br />1) How do I decide on the transmitter gain of the cell tower and the receiver gain i.e. the mobile device?<br />2) Is there a typical transmitter power that is used? I found that the transmitted power needs to be licensed. <br /><br />other Qs may follow.<br /><br />Thanks,<br />Jon]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Matching transmission losses on Solid State Power Amplifier</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=50308</link> 
		<pubDate>2013-01-15T13:08:42 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>webharvest</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ This is a weird way of looking at matching losses so I want to confirm I am looking at this properly.  Normally you would look at it as reducing RF output power.<br />I have tuned my solid state power amplifier (SSPA) so I have a pretty good match (1.5:1 worse case).  The antenna it is connected to has a 2:1 mismatch.  Now this is were it gets interesting; we only made power output measurements with a 2:1 sliding load connected to the output and rotated the angle of the load to get a minimum output power measurement.  Let's say that measurement is 30dBm.  Someone wants to know what the theoretical maximum power of the SSPA could be based on this minimum measurement because we can't retake the measurement to find the angle at which the maximum power is produced.  Keep in mind the output of the SSPA has an isolator so the active devices are fairly well isolated from the load and don't get pulled around during the rotation of the angle.  <br />Here are my thoughts:<br />1) The 2:1 mismatch has a transmission loss of 0.51dB<br />2) The 1.5:1 mismatch of the SSPA has a transmission loss of 0.18dB<br /><br />When we made the first measurement we intentionally rotated the angle of the load to find the worse case match or minimum Pout point.  If you connect a 2:1 sliding load again is it correct to say that you could theoretically find a match that would produce a power output of 30dBm + 0.51dB + 0.18dB = 30.69dBm?<br /><br />Can you explain either way?<br /><br />Thank you ahead of time for any help you can provide.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Sony Ericsson GT47 wireless modem</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=49981</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-12-29T18:34:37 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>jhowell</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Is there anyone out there who can help with a CD for this device? I bought it some months ago secondhand complete with a CD, but unfortunately the CD has warped over time and cannot be read. Since all the documentation and software is on the CD, the modem is presently useless! The CD is labelled P/N GT47ModemKit Rev 1.1 and was supplied by eurodis. I will gladly show this CD as proof that my request is 100% legitimate. All I want to do is program it to send an SMS when instructed by a PIC. Any help will be much appreciated. Regards, Jeff]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>MASTERS THESIS</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=49464</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-11-28T19:30:16 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>chimbuchinkachukwu</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I am a graduate student. I need a masters thesis topic on communications that i can write. Any suggestions?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>BEng , GPA calculation , united kingdom</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=49093</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-11-07T05:37:48 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>shehan</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Does any one know , how the classes were awarded ( 1st , 2nd upper,2nd lower..etc) for the direct entry students in UK universities , after completing their degree program<br /><br />Assume that one international direct entry student has got a 1st clz degree after completing his final year in a UK university.And he has average score of 70 in his 6 final year subjects.<br /><br />Also ,he got final year entrance  because he has successfully completed Edexcel HND.<br /><br />So the question is how the GPA was calculated for the fist two years..?..any one has an idea..??]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>How Do I Improve DTV Signal Strength?</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=49061</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-11-05T10:45:50 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>cloudserver</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Your DTV reception can be affected by terrain, trees, buildings, the weather, damaged equipment, as well as antenna type, location, and orientation. It can be improved just by changing the location of the antenna you're using now. Moving your antenna away from other objects and structures, or placing it higher, can often improve reception. The performance of outdoor antennas can degrade over time due to exposure to the weather. Also, you may consider installing a signal booster, which should improve reception. If you are having trouble receiving a broadcast:<br /><br />Check your connections.<br />Perform a channel scan.<br />Adjust your antenna.<br />etc.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>The demise of Teletext and NICAM sound</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=49008</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-11-01T05:46:33 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>jencam</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ When the last analogue television transmitter was switched off in the UK, Teletext and NICAM sound died along with it. Should we celebrate these British innovations or should they be allowed to become fading memories of a bygone era? American technology historians will probably ignore them as they generally tend to ignore (more recent?) technologies not used in the US. <br /><br />Is there still a market for Teletext and NICAM sound ICs or will semiconductor manufacturers discontinue them?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=48861</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-10-19T16:36:27 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>shehan</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ PDH works with the tributaries (2048 kbit/s) deliberately running at a rate relative to the higher order multiplex so that a justification bit is needed on approximately every other opportunity. So if the tributary runs a fraction faster then a justification bit is needed more often. There are 3 majority voted justification control bits to say if justification is necessary in which case a bit is added. If it is not necessary, the opportunity for an extra bit is not used.<br /><br />A 2048 kbit/s stream carries a synchronisation pattern in timeslot zero. If a bit is corrupted then the sync pattern still occurs in the correct place, so provided several successive sync patterns are not corrupted then there is no loss of synchronisation. If you lose a bit or add a bit when you should not then, the sync pattern will appear to be corrupted on several occasions and loss of sync will be declared and then a search for the synch pattern has to start again from scratch in order to regain synchronisation. Loss of synchronisation is not good!]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Satellite Antenna Cross Polaristaion issue.</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=48792</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-10-16T09:20:28 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>GraemeMeek</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I have recently been working on an Andrew 4.6m Ku-Band antenna fitted with a 4-port feed making it ready to carry traffic. During the testing I carried out Azimuth and Elevation cuts which passed the 29-25log Theta masks, G/T measurements and Antenna Gain measurements. The issue that I came across was when carrying out the cross polarisation check with SES. The antenna failed the cross pol check in the V-Pol as it could only achieve a separation of 25dB. The cross pol on the H-Pol was 30dB. The 4 port feed was rotated by 90 degrees as it is necessary to transmit on the V-Pol. I fully expected the issue to rotate with the feed however, on carrying out the test again the V-Pol failed and the H-Pol passed with the same figures. Further checks were then carried out on the antenna and system including visual inspections of the feedhorn assembly, OMT and a physical check of the sub-reflector position. The sub-reflector was re-focused and went back to the same position as it started from. Again the antenna was cross poled with SES and again failed on the V-Pol. Just to confirm that the issue was not with SES I carried out a cross pol check with Eutelsat and got the same results. Andrew Technical Support have been contacted in the USA and they asked to carry out all the checks that I have previously described. They are also stumped by this one and have gone away to have another think about it. I have never come across an issue like this before and would like to throw the topic open to the forum to see if I can get any feedback as to what could be causing the problem.<br />Best Regards,<br />Graeme]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Digital vs Analogue TV</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=48679</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-10-05T17:37:40 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>bille1319                                         </dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ In N.Ireland we're expecting anologue TV transmissions to cease on the 10th Oct. I'm for one am not relishing the prospect for several reasons.<br />Apart from the extra 200+ programmes consisting mostly of rubbish my concerns in the main are:<br /> <br />1. The transmission time lag is very noticeable and could be anything up to 2secs delay behind analogue.<br />2. Teletext is cumbersome and slow with the pages slow to load in comparison to analogue plus the time clock is always out.<br />3.The picture quality is not much better even when  the High Definition programmes are broadcast and tend to suffer from interference much more readily which either freezes the screen or pixilates it. <br /><br />At the time of analogue TV closedown  will the digital TV signals be boosted to give better coverage otherwise I should invest in a new antenna system? IET members living in UK mainland should have experienced this.<br /><br />I don't know a lot about Digital Radio but I understand it's quality is not all it should be either with FM radio winning hands down as regards audio quality. perhaps this has something to do with the restricted bandwidth requirements.<br /><br />Let's hear your views on this one.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Crackling on phoneline</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=48087</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-08-22T11:02:33 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>acsinuk</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ My BT line gets fits of crackling and we are 2 miles away from the exchange.  I have renewed the BT box 1036886 which cleared the worse and cleaned up all the pushin connectors which helped a little.  The broadband seems OK but still the phone gets an occasional fit.<br />As I am a talktalk customer used their checker which says it is working OK but little else.<br />So decided to check line with voltmeter and confirmed the DC volts from true earth are A=+3.7 volts and B=+55.5 to 50.3 but will not stabilize. But the DC volts between A and B is 51.9 most of the time but occasionally it drops to 49.8 or surges up to 53.6 causing crackling.  The AC range of digital voltmeter reads mostly about 0.7 volts varying about 0.1 volts occasionally between A ad B.   <br />If I install a sacrificial anode by earthing my A wire will this help??]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>TV Antenna Field Pattern</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=48047</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-08-19T11:03:29 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>g3xoi</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Is there anything on this page that might be similar?  - at least to identify the manufacturer's style?<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.frequencydistribution.co.uk/products/?&s=aerials-uhf-fm-dab">http://www.frequencydistributi...&s=aerials-uhf-fm-dab</a><br /><br />failing that; this site has a wealth of interesting and useful TV aerial info;<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.wrightsaerials.co.uk/">http://www.wrightsaerials.co.uk/</a><br /><br />HTH]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Cognitive Radio</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47549</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-07-18T10:57:49 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>leandros</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi everyone ,<br /><br />Is there someone knowing about a "good" simulator for cognitive radio networks ?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Dome Aerials</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47546</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-07-18T08:52:34 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>davebp</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>6</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi All, - sorry for this slightly mundane post....<br /><br />I am looking at aerials for receiving digital TV, FM radio and DAB radio for distribution via a loft box and have come across these:<br /><br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://cpc.farnell.com/jsp/level5/module.jsp?moduleId=cpc/630801.xml">SLX DOME</a><br /><br />Can there be a one size fits all solution to this that actually works, or is it just a gimmick?<br /><br />I was assuming I would fit both TV and Radio aerials, but am always a sucker for new gadgets. - It looks quite space age too!<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />Dave.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>HELP ANY SKY FITTERS</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47542</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-07-17T17:56:03 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>beaver74</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi all<br /><br />I have just gone head over foot down a set of stairs and I pulled a extension plug apart <br />it has SKY TV DO NOT UNPLUG<br />at the far end of the plug is a phone point and a small conection possible data.<br />at the far end the phone work fine.<br />at the plug end which plugs into the main phone point there are 2 cores not connected(or have they pulled out???)<br />does any one know if the phone point at the end of the extension lead are seperate or the unterminated core were like it befor I pulled them<br /><br />cheers]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>IEEE 1901 and related standards in library?</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47441</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-07-12T20:20:53 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>ehalls</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Can't seem to find anything linking to the IEEE standards, and I'm not sure if I remember correctly but I used to login and access IEEE explore through my IET subscription. <br /><br />Has something changed? Where can I get access to the IEEE1901 and related standards?  Just want to read them from my remote location.<br /><br />Cheers]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Mobile phones and/or WIFI</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47395</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-07-10T03:11:02 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>ngaylard</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I have over 15 years of RF and Microwave design experience at component level, mainly in ISM band products, but also specialist security industry related products. Due to a relocation (Western Australia) there is very little work in these industries and I would like to cross over into either the mobile phone arena or WiFi. <br /><br />The work available is not component level design, but rather system level integration, or site planning. I've been thinking about doing a Masters in Communications part time, but if anyone can suggest alternatives I would appreciate it. <br /><br />What might make things difficult is that I can't afford to drop back down to a junior engineering level, certainly not for an extended period of time.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Simulators for Cognitive Radio Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47389</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-07-09T11:26:45 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>leandros</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Dear All,<br /><br />i want your opinion about a evaluation of the current simulators which are<br />applied in cognitive radio networks .<br /><br />Thanks in advance !<br /><br />e-mail: leandros_tz@hotmail.com]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Simulators for Cognitive Radio Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47333</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-07-04T13:22:30 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>leandros</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hallo everybody ,<br /><br /> i'm a junior Communication Engineer and i have take over a project which is based on Cognitive Radio Networks . So, i would like to know about the existing simulators which cover the below topics:<br /><br />1. Evaluation & Validation of simulation models<br /><br />2.Comparison with other simulation/emulation tools<br /><br />3. Parallel simulation & simulation control<br /><br />4.Intergration of hardware-specific code <br /><br />5. Simulation of communication networks<br /><br />6.Intergration with other simulation tools<br /><br />7.Result interpretation & analysis<br /><br />8.Modeling techniques<br /><br />9.Simulation in the top<br /><br />10.Cross-layer protocol design methologies<br /><br />11.Simulation in the loop<br /><br />I consider that a possible "good" simulator for cognitive radio networks is OMNET++/MiXiM f  but i would rather your opinion about the "appropiate" simulators and which of these specifications are served.<br /><br />Thanks in advance]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Fiber Optic Converter for Allen Bradley DH+</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47276</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-06-30T17:35:14 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>liamor29</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Our installation uses 5 No. Westermo converters which are obsolete.<br />We need new replacements. Anyone any idea who makes converters to suit DH+ Protocol.<br />Any advice welcome<br />Thank you<br />William<img src="/forums/forum/i/expressions/light.gif" border="0">]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Identify Mute Call in a Drive Test</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47248</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-06-28T10:38:22 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>mshafique</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ What is a possible way to identify mute calls in drive test logs? We don't want to do it manually or by hearing but by analyzing log files. One possibility could be using DTX. Kindly share your views.<br /><br />cheers]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>[Q] 4G Mobile Networks Refresher Training/Info Providers</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47095</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-06-19T14:17:45 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>anro15</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ In starting a new job later this year, I am trying to get up to speed on 4G mobile networks, principally the frequency and spectrum aspects that may interact with other systems in adjacent/shared frequency bands.<br /><br />The last time I touched on the area was 8 years ago during my masters, therefore I am looking for any known courses/private tutors that would provide a refresher to the area for up to a week.  Any recommendations would be appreciated, even good books that may help.  Thank you.<br /><br />Andy]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>OPNET simultaneous timers or processes</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=47057</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-06-15T21:09:29 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>SangM</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br /><br />I am running into a issue where I am unable to run two timers simultaneously. I get the multiple timers error. I am also looking for an alternative of spawning two processes parallely at the same time. But this is also not my solution. DOes anybody have a idea how to go about this?<br /><br />THanks a lot,<br />Sangeetha]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Indipendent Component Analysis and ramp effect</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=46964</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-06-11T16:56:58 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>Giuseppe</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi all, I'm studying Indipendent Component Analysis, that is a non parametric technique of separation of observed signals in additive components. It seems that it works only with time stationary processes, and fail in presence of non time stationary ones (exponential ramp, linear ramp, etc.). Are there other non-parametric techniques of blind source separation (or variation of ICA) that work well in in these cases?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Electromagnetic Compatability</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=46943</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-06-09T05:19:16 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>raymondfcragg</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Does anyone know if there is a comparable standard in the IEC to EEC regulation 89/336/EEC?<br /><br />If so what is the IEC reference number? (I know it is 61xxxxx) <br /><br />Thanks in advance]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>ESA IAP Call for User Ideas on Critical Infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=46939</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-06-08T15:45:44 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>IanDowney</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ <b>IAP Call for User Ideas on Critical Infrastructure </b><br />Call closes on June 22nd<br /><br />The Integrated Applications Promotion (IAP) programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) is inviting public and commercial end-user organisations to propose ideas and suggestions for new services in Critical Infrastructure as defined below. The aim is to generate ideas leading to services that will improve business performance and operations, help enforce new regulatory standards, or enable improved resilience.<br />The ideas will be used to help define and consolidate requirements for user-driven services supported through the IAP programme.<br /><br />Full details of the Call and on how to submit your ideas online can be found at:<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://iap.esa.int/opportunities/iap/critical-infrastructure-call-for-user-ideas">http://iap.esa.int/opportuniti...e-call-for-user-ideas</a><br /><br />Your ideas and suggestions should reach us by 22nd June 2012.<br /><br />Critical Infrastructures<br /><br />Critical Infrastructures can be defined as those handling essential goods (e.g. water, energy, food, confidential information) and/or services (e.g. health, financial transactions or resilience services). Infrastructures are  critical when they represent key enablers in a large variety of economic sectors. Loss or damage of critical infrastructure would have a severe and widespread impact, e.g. disruption of supplies or services, injury or loss of human lives, risks to or destruction of the environment, breach of national security or economic interests.<br /><br />Criticality is also determined by the level of endangerment the infrastructure is subject to, and by its vulnerability to such hazards. Infrastructures are particularly exposed to hazards when physically spread out, e.g. linear infrastructures such as pipelines. Hazards can be diffuse (e.g. low intensity hazards affecting infrastructure over a long period of time) or acute (e.g. sudden attacks, accidents, natural hazards). They can also be predictable (e.g. corrosion) or unpredictable (e.g. tsunami or terrorist attack).<br /><br />Hazards to critical infrastructure need not only be physical. For instance, cyber attacks may damage internet-linked control systems that are related to critical infrastructures such as the electrical grid, water treatment facilities, refineries, pipelines and dams.<br /><br />Critical infrastructures are most often man-made, such as power plants or airports. Yet they can also be natural. For example, wetlands are a  natural infrastructure that store water and thereby mitigate floods.<br /><br />Critical infrastructures typically enable the production, processing, transportation, storage or protection of essential goods, as well as the provision of basic services such as:<br /><br /><UL>Water (e.g. water pipes, treatment plants, water towers, dykes, dams, canals).<br />Food (e.g. roads, warehouses, ports).<br />Energy (e.g. pipelines, refineries, energy grids, power plants).<br />Confidential or critically sensitive information (e.g. telecommunication infrastructure).<br />Health and well-being (e.g. hospitals, waste treatment plants).<br />Environmental protection (e.g. pollution prevention, CO2 storage).</UL><br /><br />Call for User Ideas<br /><br />Themes that it is intended to cover in this Call for User Ideas include (but are not restricted to):<br /><br /><UL>Mitigation: Deployment of protective systems to prevent damage or disruption by resilience to hazards. For mitigation of cyber attacks this should include encryption techniques and other methods.<br />Preparedness: Monitoring conditions and taking preventive actions, e.g. identification, monitoring & quantification of hazards, vulnerability and risks; infrastructure health monitoring; preventive maintenance.<br />Response: Activation of emergency spare capacity to satisfy peak demand, or to back-up failed infrastructure, e.g. space telecommunications as a back-up communications infrastructure.<br />Recovery: Supporting strategies minimising the propagation of negative effects caused after disruption such as evacuation of people and emergency repairs, and help in the assessment of damage caused to or by disrupted infrastructure.</UL><br /><br />How to participate?<br /><br />The Call for User Ideas on Critical Infrastructure is driven purely by the users' perspective and their needs. The ideas submitted will be used to help define and consolidate themes and priorities of future IAP projects. This may include both Feasibility Studies (through Open Competitions or Direct Negotiation), or directly through Demonstration Projects.<br /><br />Full details of the Call and on how to submit your ideas online can be found at:<br /><a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://iap.esa.int/opportunities/iap/critical-infrastructure-call-for-user-ideas">http://iap.esa.int/opportuniti...e-call-for-user-ideas</a><br /><br />Your ideas and suggestions should reach us by 22nd June 2012.<br /><br />Please be assured that all inputs will be treated confidentially. <br /><br />Your ideas are highly valued, and will help shape the IAP programme of ESA in order to meet your needs.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Odd wireless phone problem</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=46875</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-06-03T01:56:14 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>MPVaughan</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>10</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi all, <br /><br />Why would a wireless landline phone give perfect sound quality when stood outside the house, but awfull sound quallity ( crackling / interference ) when inside stood next to its docking station or anywhere else inside the house for that matter??? <br /><br />Its driving me and the client mad as there seems to be no reasonable explaination. <br /><br />Thanks, <br />MP]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>No GSM/DCS at higher floor.</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=46871</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-06-02T14:15:20 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>megaprocessor</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Recently a real estate guy got in touch with me.They are building a 55 storied building.They have no signal at all from 19th to 55th floor.<br />He contacted to all the mobile operators for the same but since that building is the only super tall building in that area they are not ready to help.<br /><br /><br />So this guy wants me to do something for it.<br /><br />Now i do repeaters for basements and resturants..but in-building ,i have enevr done before.<br /><br />I havent visited the site yet but from what i see i need to pickup the signal from 18th floor boost it and feed it everywhere..that sounds lot of cabling..which means losses to..and also i dont wish to distort the cell.<br /><br />Anyone here who can throw some light?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Same Antenna for transmission and reception</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=46809</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-05-30T19:17:01 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>ubercool</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Can a same antenna be used for transmission and reception when the transmission and reply frequencies are 63Mhz apart?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>My internship in China Experience</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=46779</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-05-29T04:42:17 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>getin2china</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Back in 2010 when I did my last year of studies at the university I took a course on Chinese culture. It was an optional one, and I needed it only to get enough scores to graduate. However, it was exactly that course to trigger my interest in China. Right after my graduation paper had been submitted, I started to look into the possibility of going to China to study the language a bit and preferably to do an internship. I didn't hope that much to be able to find an <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.getin2china.com">internship in China</a>. After all, I studied journalism, and with that and no Chinese language abilities chances seem to be pretty slim for a professional kick-off in a country like China. <br />After an hour of googling and checking the websites I opted for <b>Get in2 China Group</b>. Their combined courses of internship and language appealed to me a lot. Besides, they seemed rather professional with their services and organization. I sent them an e-mail and got reply next day. Information exchange followed, and two weeks later I got enrolled in a combined 'internship + language' program. One week more, and I had my first job interview via Skype. It went well with all the tips Getin2China staff gave me. So, I got an internship with China Radio International - a large state media holding in Beijing. <br /><br />That's how my professional career started. I went to work 5 days per week, working 9 to 5. But I really enjoyed it - getting to know the operation engine of an enormous state media machine. At first my tasks were too simple to call my job demanding. I was only proofreading and polishing the news and programs our department published on website or broadcast. Then I was transferred to the team of editors for the online magazine the department published monthly. Once in a while I was also assigned to present radio programs. On the fourth month of my internship I was offered to try myself as a real-TV journalist. We have also a video section in our department, and my assignment was to cover various stories about China. Thus, within half a year of internship I managed to try various aspects of working in media area. The last two months were crazy - in the morning I edited and corrected, in the afternoon I would record a program for radio or our team would go to some place or event for video shooting. Also, three times per week after work I would join the other students of <b>Get in2 China Group</b> for the Chinese language classes. It helped me a lot to establish good relations with my Chinese colleagues. I also had a chance to practice my Chinese skills with them. <br /><br />By now my internship is over but I am still in China, and now officially working for China Radio International. I was offered one-year contract within the company upon completion of my internship. I still do not know how long I will stay here after the contract is over, but what I know for sure is that the experience of working in China and studying the language has already laid solid foundation for the future career. Now I only need to apply my skills and knowledge as much as possible, develop them more and keep on growing professionally.]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>rf to visible light</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=46758</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-05-27T12:02:15 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>ravali</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ how can we convert radio signals to visible light?<br />if we can, will it be visible to us?]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>System Integration</title>
		<link>http://www.theiet.org/forums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=220&amp;threadid=46747</link> 
		<pubDate>2012-05-26T06:55:37 00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>raymondfcragg</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Does anyone know of a good system integrator? I am looking for one who can handle all of our systems for a project in Kazakhstan.<br /><br />All leads gratefully received<br /><br /><img src="/forums/forum/i/expressions/face-icon-small-cool.gif" border="0">]]></description>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>
